Legal Opinion

Mondert v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals on the ground of inadequacy, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J., on liability; Greenstein, J., on damages), dated July 7, 1993, as, upon a jury verdict finding him 50% at fault in the happening of the accident and finding that he had suffered damages for pain and suffering in the amount of $400,000, is in his favor on the issue of pain and suffering in the principal amount of only $200,000, and the defendant cross-appeals from the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kane v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Ahmed v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. LaBorde v. Most Service Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Acevedo v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API