Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL N. BROWN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Intel Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment that Cyrix Microprocessors Made by Affiliates of SGS-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc. are Not Licensed by Intel and SGS-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court having considered the motions, the responses, the briefs and arguments of the parties and all of the summary judgment evidence, is of the opinion, for the reasons stated below, that Intel’s motion should be denied and intervenor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Casey Enterprises, Inc. And D/B/A Pendley Hills Hardware and Minit Check Grocery, Fite H. Casey, Jr. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Carey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Positive Software v. New Century MortgageCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Cyrix Corporation, and Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc., and International Business MacHines Corporation v. Intel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- SuperSpeed, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Fireblok IP Holdings, LLC v. Hilti, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
- Positive Software Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006