Legal Opinion

Denton Const. Co. v. Missouri Portland Cement Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 19, 1981No. 80-924C(C)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

507 F.Supp. 53 (1981)

DENTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff,

v.

MISSOURI PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, Defendant.

No. 80-924C(C).

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

January 19, 1981.

Joseph Murphy, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Jim J. Shoemake, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

MEREDITH, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, defendant's motion will be granted and plaintiff will be allowed 30 days to file an amended complaint in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,926 Associated Builders, Inc. v. Alabama Power CompantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Martin McNally v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company and Ted GestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Goldman v. BeldenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1984
  5. Comerio v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API