Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Belden
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 24, 1984No. CIV-82-869TPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, personally and purportedly as.a representative of others similarly situated, commenced this action against Sykes Data-tronics, Inc., (“Sykes”) and several of its directors and officers alleging violations of Section 10b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. Section 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder. Defendants initially moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and for failure to comply with the pleading specificity requirements…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Woodfork v. GavinDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1985
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.