Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Keeling v. Keeling

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 17, 2014No. 2120612 and 2120613Published

1Concurrence

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge,

concurring as to the appeals and concurring in part and concurring in the result in part as to the cross-appeals. I concur in all aspects of the main opinion except that portion addressing the claim in the cross-appeals brought by Jamie Keeling (“Jamie”), individually and as personal representative of the estate of Rex George Keeling (“Rex’s estate”), for attorney’s fees to be included as part of the costs to be taxed against James W. Keeling (“James”), individually and as personal representative of the estate of Neita B. Keeling (“Neita’s estate”), in which I concur…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burkett v. AM. GENERAL FINANCESupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. L.J.K. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Thompson v. PattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Huntley v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Meigs v. Estate of MobleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API