Legal Opinion

Pahle v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 1985No. 2-2402-AM0881-4; CA A29479PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Petitioner seeks review of a revised order on reconsideration by Adult and Family Services Division denying him Aid to Dependent Children benefits. He argues that the agency denied benefits on the basis of an agency rule that impermissibly conflicts with federal regulations. We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Petitioner is a 22-year-old who was discharged from the Air Force because of a back problem. At the hearing to determine his eligibility for ADC benefits on the basis of incapacity to work, he produced evidence that he suffers from a condition known as spondylolisthesis, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glass v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Schofield v. Public Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moccio v. Department of Human Resources, Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Sunny Oaks, Inc. v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Gaspard v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Sunny Oaks, Inc. v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Swofford v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API