Legal Opinion
Moccio v. Department of Human Resources, Adult & Family Services Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 29, 1990No. 2-2801-AP5222-9; CA A49591PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Claimant appeals from an order of respondent (AFSD) that discontinued Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) to three minor children and denied her application for benefits on behalf of the children. ORS 418.125; ORS 183.415 to ORS 183.470. We affirm.
In its reconsideration order, AFSD found these facts:
“1. For approximately the past two years, [claimant] has lived with John Martin and his three minor children. The oldest child is 11 years old. In March 1988, Mr. Martin was arrested. On March 17,1988, [claimant] had herself appointed the legal guardian of the children by a Multnomah County Circuit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Jungen v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Pahle v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Specialty Family Homes v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Specialty Family Homes v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026