Legal Opinion

Glass v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1984No. 2-1801-GOL463-5; CA A27163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Petitioner appeals the final order of an Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) hearing officer, by which her continuing eligibility for Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) was denied. Because we find that the agency has failed to follow its own rules, we remand. ORS 183.482(7).

Petitioner, age 37, lives in Klamath Falls with her husband and two young children. She has a history of severe psychiatric disorders that have substantially interfered with her ability to obtain and hold gainful employment.1 On the basis of her incapacity, petitioner was approved by the Medical Review Team (MRT) for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Adult and Family ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Howard v. Adult & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pahle v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Sunny Oaks, Inc. v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Sunny Oaks, Inc. v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API