Legal Opinion
WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided October 26, 2018No. Lead Case No. CV 16-65-M-DWM; Member Case No. CV 17-99-M-DWMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Donald W. Molloy, District Judge United States District Court
Plaintiffs WildEarth Guardians and the Center for Biological Diversity (collectively "Plaintiffs") seek declaratory and injunctive relief against the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and related officials and entities (collectively the "Service") for violating the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") and the Endangered Species Act ("ESA") in their administration of a wildlife export program under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species ("CITES").2 Because the continued administration of the CITES…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flathead-Lolo-Bitterroot Citizen Task Force v. State of MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
- Flathead-Lolo-Bitterroot Citizen Task Force v. State of MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024
- Ksanka Kupaqa Xa'lcin v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019