Legal Opinion
Baram v. Schwartz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 21, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiff, father of a ten-year-old boy, brought this habeas corpus action requesting the Superior Court to make such order concerning his son’s custody as would best serve the boy’s welfare. After a full hearing, the court decided that the best interest of the boy would be served by awarding custody to the defendant, his maternal uncle, and rendered judgment accordingly. The plaintiff has appealed, claiming only that the court failed to give full faith and credit to a Rhode Island Family Court custody decree rendered after the present action was commenced and that no change of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Fantony v. FantonySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Kelsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Adamsen v. AdamsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Halstead Ex Rel. Lee v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Howarth v. NorthcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Daniel v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.