Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 16, 2000No. AC 18250PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HEALEY, J.

The petitioner, Ronald Lee Daniel, has taken this appeal from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he made four claims challenging the legality of his confinement. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court acted improperly (1) in finding that the record established that his plea of guilty was knowing, intelligent and voluntary,1 (2) in rejecting *653his claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in the underlying criminal proceeding, and (3) in rejecting his claim that the trial court…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Milner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. State v. IralaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Jordan v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API