Legal Opinion

Ex parte Stacey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1904PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Habeas corpus to inquire into the cause of the imprisonment of Bert Stacey. The prisoner was remanded and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

This is a special proceeding to inquire into the cause of the imprisonment of Bert Stacey. A writ of habeas corpus having been issued and directed to W. A. Storey, as Sheriff of Multnomah County, he, as a return thereto, cer*86tified that Stacey had been convicted in the circuit court of that county of the crime of robbery, and, having been sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of two years, was committed to his custody, to be taken to the place of incarceration, setting out a copy of the judgment in pursuance of which he held the prisoner, whom he also produced. The return…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Barton v. SaundersOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ex parte HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Garner v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ex parte FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hills v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. In Re Application of LoundaginOregon Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API