Legal Opinion

Read v. Young Roofing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1951No. 163PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevist, C. J.

We think the portions of the pleading quoted above, considered in connection with other allegations of fact set out in defendant’s answer and cross-action, are sufficient to state a cause of action for contribution against the appellant as joint tort-feasor, as permitted by the statute Gr.S. 1-240, and that the demurrer was properly overruled.

The appellant’s position is that in defendant’s cross-action to which the demurrer was addressed it was alleged that Rosa Palmer’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the injury, and that she and plaintiff’s intestate were joint adventurers, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Freeman v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Bryant v. Little River Ice Co. of Zebulon, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Evans v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Wiscassett Mills Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Taylor v. Kinston Free Press Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. White v. KellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. McDaniel v. QuakenbushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Wise v. VincentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API