Legal Opinion
Diamaco, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 7, 1999No. 42988-4-IPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
At issue in this appeal is whether Diamaco Inc.’s umbrella insurance policies issued by Travelers Casualty and Surety Company (formerly known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company) covered the City of Seattle’s claims against Diamaco. The claims were for property damage incurred during a construction project that Diamaco performed under a contract with the City. Because the trial court correctly determined that there was no coverage under the policies, we affirm.
In July 1994, the City of Seattle awarded Diamaco a $1.4 million contract to construct several seismic retrofit systems for the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Overton v. Consolidated InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Kemper National Insurance Companies v. Heaven Hill Distilleries, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.