Legal Opinion
William D. HARDIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUSSMANN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1995No. 93-3926EMPublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Chief District Judge.
William Hardin appeals from a summary judgment granted to Hussmann Corporation (Hussmann) on his claim that Hussmann terminated his employment, at the age of 51, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1982). The parties consented the case to a magistrate judge who held that Hussmann was entitled to summary judgment as Hardin was terminated pursuant to a reduction-in-foree (RIF) and had failed to present a prima facie case of age discrimination. Hardin argues 1) the magistrate judge erroneously concluded that Hardin…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Loren Johnson v. Minnesota Historical SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Earl HOLLEY, Appellee, v. SANYO MANUFACTURING, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Gaworski v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- James F. HUTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Barnes v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Sullivan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- James E. Matthews v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.