Legal Opinion
City of Arcadia v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 16, 2003No. C 02-5244 SBAPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING ACTION
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs City of Arcadia and other California cities (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the EPA Administrator, and the EPA Region IX Administrator (collectively, “Defendants”) for injunctive and declaratory relief. The Natural Resources Defense Council, Santa Monica BayKeeper, and Heal the Bay (collectively, “Interve-nors”) have intervened as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- American Farm Bureau Federation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Kennett v. Envtl. Prot. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Wyoming v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2005
- Bravos v. GreenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.