Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Department of Finance, Budget & Business v. Thurston County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1939No. 27428Published

1DissentSimpson, J.

(dissenting) — The majority, for the purpose of ascertaining the meaning of the statute in question, divides it into two parts: First, to ascertain the duty of the court and its powers; second, to show the authority of the superintendent of the hospital.

While it will readily be conceded that every presumption is to be indulged in favor of the constitutionality of a statute, and giving full effect thereto, I cannot subscribe to the construction placed upon the statute by the majority for the reason that, to my mind, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 6930 [P. C. § 2827], vests in the courts the power to…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Langever v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. MulcareWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Washington Toll Bridge Authority v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1938

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API