State ex rel. Department of Finance, Budget & Business v. Thurston County
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSimpson, J.
(dissenting) — The majority, for the purpose of ascertaining the meaning of the statute in question, divides it into two parts: First, to ascertain the duty of the court and its powers; second, to show the authority of the superintendent of the hospital.
While it will readily be conceded that every presumption is to be indulged in favor of the constitutionality of a statute, and giving full effect thereto, I cannot subscribe to the construction placed upon the statute by the majority for the reason that, to my mind, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 6930 [P. C. § 2827], vests in the courts the power to…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Langever v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. MulcareWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Washington Toll Bridge Authority v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.