Cunningham v. State

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Eric Cunningham, was convicted of indirect criminal contempt. He was sentenced to five days in jail. The appellant presents the following issues on appeal.

I

The appellant argues that the evidence did not support the finding of the trial court. The appellant maintains that there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty of criminal contempt.

The state’s evidence tended to show that the appellant was subpoenaed to appear in court concerning a probation revocation on February 13,1991.1 The appellant failed to *396appear in court on February 13,1991. Sergeant Rufus, of…