Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 13, 1992No. CR-91-1564PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Eric Cunningham, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant was convicted of indirect criminal contempt in 1991 and was sentenced to five days in jail. We affirmed the appellant's conviction and sentence inCunningham v. State, 590 So.2d 395 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991). Appellate counsel petitioned the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review, but the petition was stricken because it was untimely.

The appellant argues in this petition for post-conviction relief that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TarverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. Nicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Burton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Harris v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Parker v. City of TuscaloosaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API