Legal Opinion

Kubicki v. City of North Royalton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 2000No. 76158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John T. Patton, Presiding Judge.

The city of North Royalton maintains several sewer districts. As relevant to this appeal, two of those districts are serviced entirely by a city owned system and are known as sewer districts “A” and “B”. A third district, sewer district “C”, has been serviced by the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (“NEORSD”). In 1996, pursuant to a mandate by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, North Royalton began a $20 million project to upgrade its sewer system. As a way of recouping the cost of the project, the city passed legislation that consolidated district…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Granzow v. Bureau of SupportOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In re Mental Illness of BoggsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Himebaugh v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. City of Wooster v. GrainesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Giesel v. City of Broadview HeightsCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API