Legal Opinion
Giesel v. City of Broadview Heights
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
Decided March 4, 1968No. Nos. 827487, 831031PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ÁNgelotta, J.
The plaintiffs, Kathryn A. Moss and Lois N. Giesel, were at the time of filing their petitions and at the time of trial, citizens, home owners and taxpayers of the city of Broadview Heights. Their legal positions were basically similar. The defendants are the city of Broadview Heights, a charter city; its Mayor, Raymond Fetzek; its Director of Finance, Marie Bender; and the individual members of its council as constituted on the date of the filing of the law suits. Also named as defendants are the city of Cleveland, which had a contract with the defendant, Broadview Heights, to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- Himebaugh v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Grim v. Village of LouisvilleOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- State v. BartosArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Groghan v. RulonClinton County Court of Common Pleas · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jennings v. WalshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Concord Steam Corp. v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Seal Tanning Co. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Lake Stevens Sewer District v. Village Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Kubicki v. City of North RoyaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.