Legal Opinion
Phoenix Assurance Co. of Canada v. Runck
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1982No. Civ. Nos. 10065, 10069 and 10090PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Justice.
These are consolidated appeals by the defendants and appellants, Clayton E. Runck, Jr., Herman Sobania, and George Schulz, from a state district court’s order granting plaintiffs’ and appellees’, Phoenix Assurance Company of Canada, Norwich Union Fire Society, Ltd., Royal Insurance Company of Canada, Sun Insurance Office, and Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, [hereinafter collectively referred to as Phoenix] motions directing the defendants to respond to certain discovery procedures initiated by Phoenix and from the state district court’s order denying the defendants’ motion…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Vorachek v. Citizens State Bank of LankinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Vytautas GecasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. (Under Seal)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.