Legal Opinion

Manna Funding, LLC v. Kittitas County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 28, 2013No. 30539-2-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKulik, J.

¶1 The Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners (Board) twice denied an application by Manna Funding LLC1 for site-specific rezoning of its rural acreage near Roslyn. Manna sought relief under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, and the superior court ordered Kittitas County (County) to grant the rezone. Manna additionally sued the County for a claimed violation of RCW 64.40.020 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, *883and for tortious interference with a business expectancy/ tortious delay. The court dismissed Manna’s lawsuit on summary judgment and awarded the County attorney fees.…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hood Canal Sand And Gravel v. Peter GoldmarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Dolan v. GlousterOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Golden Sands Dairy LLC v. Town of SaratogaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Golden Sands Dairy LLC v. Town of SaratogaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Kassa Ins. Services v. Ryan Pugh, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API