Legal Opinion

Star Fuse Co. v. Prussian

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract in two counts, one being on an account annexed and the other for an alleged breach of an alleged contract.

The plaintiff (a New York corporation acting through its president, one Podell, who was also the sole owner and the only party interested financially in the corporation), at Cambridge, Massachusetts, after some conversation on April 27, 1920, made a contract with the defendant (doing business as an individual under the name of Guaranty Motors Company), to. manufacture Guaranty Spark Intensifires, intended to be attached to the spark plug on automobile engines…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Goldenberg v. TaglinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Morse v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Lieberman v. . Templar Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MacDonald & Payne Machine Co. v. Metallic Arts of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Snelling v. DineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Fairbanks v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  4. Mathey v. Louis G. Freeman Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1936
  5. Moseley v. Commodore Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API