Legal Opinion

Mathey v. Louis G. Freeman Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 13, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, J.

Action of contract. The declaration contained two counts, one to recover the price of certain machines ordered by the defendant from the plaintiff, and the other, to recover for refusing to accept the said machines. The answer is a general denial and the statute of frauds. There was a finding for the plaintiff. The report contains all the evidence material to the issues involved.

The defendant’s original claim of error consisted of the admission over its objection of evidence, the giving of rulings requested by the plaintiff and the denial of rulings requested by the defendant. At the oral…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Roberts v. Lynn Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Bresky v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Spevack v. BudishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. New England Cabinet Works v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API