Legal Opinion
Watkins v. Cowenhoven
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 31, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
90 N.J. Super. 17 (1965)
216 A.2d 15
ROZELL WATKINS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN COWENHOVEN AND MIRIAM COWENHOVEN, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 13, 1965.
Decided December 31, 1965.
Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.
Mr. Frederic M. Milstein argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Madnick, Milstein & Mason, attorneys).
Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom & Hack, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, S.J.A.D.
This is a workmen's compensation case in which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- O'Brien v. First Camden National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Jasaitis v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Filson v. Bell Tel. Labs., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Green v. Bell CleanersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- H. K. Ferguson Co. v. WilleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Pappas v. Sport Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Nebesne v. CrocettiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Ryan v. KasaskerisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Pearce v. NJ Highway AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.