Legal Opinion

In Re Robbins

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1930No. Docket No. 1603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioner herein was adjudged guilty of • contempt for failure to pay alimony pendente lite and attorney’s fees in' a divorce action and was committed to the county jail for five days. He seeks his release upon habeas corpus.

It appears that on November 16, 1922, petitioner filed a complaint for divorce and on February 14, 1923, the defendant in that action filed a demurrer to the complaint. On November 1, 1923, the court made an order directing petitioner to pay to the defendant $75 per month alimony pendente lite and $150 on account of attorney’s fees. On August 31, 1929, an order to show…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Hayes v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Robbins v. MulcrevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Biltmore Drug Store v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API