Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Mulcrevy

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1929No. Docket No. 7179PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Mandamus to compel respondent to ex punge the entry of an order with reference to the payment of alimony pendente lite from the 11 Judgment Docket Book.”

The facts show that on November 16, 1922, petitioner filed a complaint in an action for divorce; on February 14, 1923, defendant therein filed a demurrer to the complaint. On November 1, 1923, the court made an order directing petitioner to pay his wife $75 per month alimony pendente lite, and $150 attorney fees. Thereafter the attorney for de fendant caused said order to be entered in the “Judgment Book’’ and in the “Judgment Docket Book.’’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hite v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In re Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lincoln v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Carbone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API