Legal Opinion

State v. Case

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 7, 2009No. 98,077PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The decision of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

This case requires us to determine the effect, if any, on the defendant’s guilty plea pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 27 L. Ed. 2d 162, 91 S. Ct. 160 (1970), when he “stipulate[d] to the factual basis provided by the State.” A panel of the Court of Appeals held that Christopher Case stipulated to the facts, which eliminated the requirement that they be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt before they could be used to increase his sentence beyond the prescribed statutory maximum. See Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Ronald L. TunningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Bennett.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. EbabenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. Mashaney v. Board of Indigents' Defense ServicesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  4. State v. NunezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. State v. UnreinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API