Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Gittelsohn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 5, 1983No. CC-82-329; CA A28899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents move to dismiss the appeal because of lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal was timely filed on July 11, 1983, the last day for filing the appeal, ORS 19.026, and service was made on that day on respondents and on the Clatsop County Clerk. ORS 19.023(2) (b), as amended by Or Laws 1981, ch 177, § 1, requires that service be made on the “clerk of the trial court.”1 Since January, 1983, the County Clerk has not been the Clerk of the Trial Court.

ORS 19.033(2) provides:

“The service and filing of the notice of appeal as provided in ORS 19.023,19.026 and 19.029 is jurisdictional and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pohrman v. KLAMATH COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bauman v. GittelsohnOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Custom Harvesting Oregon, Inc. v. Smith Truck & Tractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Goldstein v. RadakovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API