Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Gittelsohn
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1984No. SC S30134 CA A28899 TC CC-82-329PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
678 P.2d 1226 (1984)
296 Or. 663
Robert G. BAUMAN, W.C. Bauman, and Rita F. Bauman, Dba Breakers Point Partnership, Petitioners On Review,
v.
Shirley GITTELSOHN and Maurice O. Georges, Respondents On Review.
SC S30134; CA A28899; TC CC-82-329.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted March 5, 1984.
Decided March 27, 1984.
J. Michael Alexander, Salem, filed petition for petitioners on review. With him on the petition was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.
Jeanyse R. Snow, Astoria, argued the cause for respondents on review. With her on the brief were Jerry K. McCallister and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Bauman v. GittelsohnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Spielman v. First Interstate BankOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Bauman v. GittelsohnOregon Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Zacker v. North Tillamook County Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Spielman v. First Interstate BankOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Wood v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Zacker v. NORTH TILLAMOOK CTY. HOSP. D.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991