Warner Glove Co. v. Jennings
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Scire eacias upon a process of foreign attachment in which the defendant was garnisheed as having in his hands moneys of one Haskell, the debtor of the plaintiffs; brought to the Court of Common Pleas of New London County, and tried to the court before Crump, J. Facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs, and appeal by the defendant. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
F. B. Hall,
J. Henry E. Haskell, being insolvent and having been threatened with suits by his creditors, sold his entire stock of goods for cash and placed $500 of the avails of the sale in the hands of the defendant.
At the time of the sale Haskell was indebted to his merchandise creditors in about the sum of $2,350 ; to relatives and friends, for money loaned, in about $3,150 ; and was liable as joint maker with his wife, upon a note of $600, fully secured by mortgage upon his wife’s property; which note and mortgage were owned by the defendant.
Said sum of $500 was placed in the defendant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meade v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
- Townsend Savings Bank v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Hawes v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
- Warder v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Beers v. BotsfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1839
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doty v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Hustad v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Chillingworth v. Eastern Tinware Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Bower v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Stanio v. Berner Lohne Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.