Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1988No. 53484Published

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Movant Orville Jackson appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted in a jury-waived trial of possession of heroin, a Schedule I controlled substance. RSMo § 195.020 (1986). He was sentenced as a persistent offender to fourteen years imprisonment. This court affirmed the conviction on direct appeal. State v. Jackson, 686 S.W.2d 21 (Mo.App., E.D.1984). On this appeal movant argues that the court erred in dismissing his motion in that his Rule 27.26 counsel failed to amend movant’s pro se motion and to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Public Defender Commission v. BonackerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Young v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Eggers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Hirsch v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API