(HC) Arellano-Cigfuego v. Warden

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ARELLANO-CIGFUEGO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01351-SAB-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 13 v. AS MOOT AND FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 14 WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases1 requires preliminary review of a 20 habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the…