Legal Opinion

United States v. Thornton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2008No. 06-50597PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

David Thornton appeals from the district court’s decision to not re-sentence him after a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). He challenges both the ruling on remand and certain issues with respect to the original sentencing.

I

Over the course of several years, Thornton successfully defrauded friends, family members, and complete strangers out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. He used two schemes: The first involved a charitable foundation he established purportedly to raise funds for kidney research for the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Michael Hayes v. Idaho Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Nick Mangiaracina v. Paul PenzoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Van AlstyneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Anthony Davila v. Robin GladdenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API