Legal Opinion

Newburger v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice McAvoy.

We are of the opinion that there are preliminary questions to be decided before arbitration may be compelled. The relation between the parties was fiduciary. The respondent Morris' Gold, *573also respondent here, alleges that when he discovered that the paper presented contained type too small for him to read and suggested that he would take it home for his son to read, he was assured by the petitioners’ representative that it was merely an authorization to the petitioners to buy and sell stock and that “ there was nothing…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Housecraft, Inc. v. FariaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1961
  2. In re the Arbitration between Big W. Construction Corp. & HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Mike's Merry Go Round Rest, Inc. v. Lincoln Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In re the Arbitration between Levy & HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  5. In re the Arbitration between Levy & HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API