Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Big W. Construction Corp. & Horowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On July 19, 1949, and July 28, 1949, petitioner contracted with respondents to perform the plumbing, heating, and oil burner work on two construction projects in Queens County. Bach contract contained a clause that “ Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract br any breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration ”. On Ápril 22, 1950, petitioner terminated the contracts and thereafter engaged others to complete the work at a dost greater than the balance due respondents *978under their contracts. On July 12, 1950, respondents commenced an action in Kings County against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. BaillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. In re Manufacturers Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Newburger v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Elias v. Artistic Paper Box Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  3. In re the Accounting of SalkinNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In re the Final Accounting of O'SheaNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Royal Hair Pin Corp. v. Rieser Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API