Legal Opinion

Federal Housecraft, Inc. v. Faria

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 23, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.

Plaintiff has brought this action to recover damages for alleged breach by defendants of a written contract. The answer includes an affirmative defense that defendants were fraudulently induced by plaintiff’s salesman to enter into the contract.

Subsequent to the filing of a note of issue, defendants demanded a trial by jury. Plaintiff thereafter moved to strike the action from the Jury Calendar upon the ground that the contract contains a provision for jury waiver in any action “ wherein * * * this agreement may be involved, or be the basis of suit.” The motion was granted, and from the order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leav v. WeitznerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Lera Realty Co. v. RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. O'Beirne v. . BullisNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Newburger v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n v. Stargate Films, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. v. BuonannoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v. Champagne, New York County Courts1967
  4. International Roofing Corp. v. Van Der VeerNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ferry v. Poughkeepsie Galleria Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API