Ames v. City of Pasadena
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem. *
The Board of Directors of the City of Pasadena upon appeal affirmed the action of the zoning committee in granting to the defendant Purpus a variance and exception from certain provisions of the city zoning ordinance. The variance and exception so granted permitted the defendant Purpus, in addition to a single family dwelling and garage, to construct a swimming pool 20 feet from a private roadway located at the rear of her property prior to the construction of the dwelling and garage; to erect a pool terrace building containing kitchen facilities, a pool equipment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steiger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Miller v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Fickeisen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jackson v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by10 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Kappadahl v. Alcan Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Running Fence Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Save El Toro Assn. v. DaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.