Legal Opinion

Clark-Montana Realty Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided February 18, 1927No. 339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

This is a mining apex suit. Because of the excessive volume of evidence, it is impracticable to collate and analyze it at length herein. Nor is it necessary, for, though there is irreconcilable conflict of inferences, opinions, and conclusions, in the main there is reasonable harmony in the vital and determinative facts out of which the conflict arises.

Moreover, trial courts, always pressed for time, well might decide forthwith like juries and their special verdicts at most. Five experts testify for each party, viz. for plaintiffs, Burch, of Oregon, Mead, of Wisconsin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart Mining Co. v. Ontario Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Clark-Montana Realty Co. v. Butte & Superior Copper Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1916
  3. Stewart Mining Co. v. Ontario Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Clark Montana Realty Co. v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Empire Star Mines Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Nava-Arellano v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API