Legal Opinion

Nava-Arellano v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 10, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00135Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISRAEL NAVA-ARELLANO, Case No.: 10-cr-3094-L 12 Petitioner, ORDER: 13 (1) DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR 14 CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT 15 v. TO

28 U.S.C. § 2255

[ECF NO. 15]; 16 (2) DENYING REQUEST FOR 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COUNSEL ECF NO 60] and Respondent. 18 (3) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF 19 APPEALABILITY. 20 Petitioner, Israel Nava-Arellano (“Petitioner” or “Nava-Arellano”) filed a motion 21 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(“Motion” or 22 “Petition”). The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API