Legal Opinion

In Re Christianson's Estate

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1942No. 28800PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

— On June 18, 1941, after due notice, a decree of distribution was entered in the above-entitled estate. February 26, 1942, Erick Christianson, a nephew of deceased, filed a motion, supported by his affidavit, to vacate the decree. The motion was grounded upon subdivisions 4 and 7 of Rem. Rev. Stat., § 464 [P. C. § 8130], the former providing for the vacation of judgments for fraud practiced by the successful party; the latter, for “casualty or misfortune preventing [a] party from prosecuting or defending; . . .” A show; cause order was issued, directed to interested parties, who appeared and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Palmquist v. SagstadWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Meeker v. WaddleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In re the Estate of DoaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Krohn v. HirschWashington Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hilton v. MumawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Ryan v. PlathWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Francon v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Batey v. BateyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Estate of Baker v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API