Stone v. State

Mikell, Judge.

After a bench trial, Rachel S. Stone was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent that she was a less safe driver. Stone appeals her conviction, enumerating as error the sufficiency of the evidence and the trial court’s exclusion of her expert’s testimony regarding the Intoxilyzer 5000. We affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict. We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determine whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia.…