Legal Opinion

Penn v. Wilderness Development Corporation

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided January 24, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00264Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE PATRICK PENN and ALICE PENN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No.: 3:22-CV-264-KAC-DCP ) WILDERNESS DEVELOPMENT ) CORPORATION d/b/a SOAKY ) MOUNTAIN WATERPARK, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This action is before the Court on the “Motion for Summary Judgment” filed by Defendant Wilderness Development Corporation d/b/a Soaky Mountain Waterpark [Doc. 38]. Because there is no genuine dispute of material fact and Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. National Satellite Sports, Inc. v. Eliadis, Inc., D/B/A Melody Lane Lounge, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., D/B/A Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Blair v. West Town MallTennessee Supreme Court · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API