Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Video Operators v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 2, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-2205PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, Chief Judge.
By this suit plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the seizure of video poker machines by the federal government. The action dies aborning.
Pennsylvania Association of Video Operators (“PAVO”) is a non-profit corporation serving as a trade association for owners of arcade amusement games such as pinball and video games. Most, if not all, of PAVO’s 25 members own and operate video poker machines in Western Pennsylvania.
In August, 1989 the late Judge Gerald J. Weber issued an extensive Opinion concerning video poker. United States v. 294 Various…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Regan v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Robert J. Ansani, Harvey Milner, John Edward Moore, Joseph J. Aiuppa and Ray JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Nilva v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re King PropertiesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Montgomery County ex rel. Becker v. Merscorp, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Jernigan v. State of Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993
- United States v. ConleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Pennsylvania Video Operators, A/K/A P.A.V.O. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.