Legal Opinion

United States v. Conley

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1994No. Crim. No. 91-178PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant John F. “Duffy” Conley’s challenge to the July 19, *8651990 searches of certain premises, ment No. 377, in part). (Doeu-

Defendant John F. “Duffy” Conley (“Duffy Conley”) has limited standing to challenge the warrants pursuant to which the July 1990 searches and seizures were undertaken. In prior proceedings, the Court ruled that Duffy Conley had Fourth Amendment interests that were implicated by seizures and searches of video poker machines from “locations” — bars, delicatessens, coffee shops, etc. — in which Duffy Conley had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. Howard Christine, Perry GraboskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. DyerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ConleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. United States v. DicristinaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API