State Bank of Chicago v. Boyesen
Appellate Court of Illinois
Garnishment.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. George W. Brown, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1899.
1DissentJustice Freeman
I can not concur in the foregoing opinion, nor the conclusion stated, and haxre concluded to state my reasons.
The principal question is xvhether the evidence warrants the finding that appellant was indebted to Thweatt, it being contended that the money in controversy ivas not the property of the attachment debtor. It is also urged that the declaration does not state a cause of action.
The defendant Thweatt did not appear. His default was entered, damages were assessed by a jury and judgment rendered against him in favor of appellee. The evidence upon which such verdict and judgment were based…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dennison v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Young v. ClappIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Meyer v. KrohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Pomeroy v. Rand, McNally & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
- National Insurance v. Chamber of CommerceIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.