Legal Opinion

Dennison v. Taylor

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1892PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the First District; —heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John P. Altgeld, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

In this attachment proceeding D. Blumenthal, H. S. Blumenthal and Louis Blumenthal, co-partners doing business as the American Paper Company, were plaintiffs in attachment, and A. T. Dennison and F. W. Dennison were defendants in attachment, a-nd George H. Taylor and James T. Mix, defendants in erlor herein, were garnishees. Said defendants in attachment were not sued as. partners, but in the affidavit for attachment, attachment bond, bond for costs, attachment writ, return on attachment writ, notice by publication and declaration, they were simply designated as A. T. Dennison and F. W.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. CarletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Haywood v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Greenman v. HarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Thormeyer v. SissonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Likens v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rabbitt v. Frank C. Weber & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. First National Bank v. Hahnemann Institutions of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. LaSalle Opera House Co. v. LaSalle Amusement Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Stumpff v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Alsen v. StonerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API