Legal Opinion

Modern System Dentists, Inc. v. State Board of Dental Examiners

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1934PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

While the principal question raised by the plaintiffs relates to the power of the State Board of Dental Examiners of Wisconsin, hereinafter called the board, to prescribe certain rules and regulations, plaintiffs also claim that the limitation on advertising contained in sec. 152.06 (6) (c) and (d) is unreasonable and arbitrary and therefore unconstitutional.. The constitutionality of the act was argued in Rust v. State Board of Dental Examiners, ante, p. 127, 256 N. W. 919. The Rust Case was disposed of upon other grounds. The question of the validity of the law was not reached. If the law…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Schumer v. CaplinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist, Inc. v. CruiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Laughney v. MayburyWashington Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Kindy v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Sherman v. State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Toole v. Michigan State Board of DentistryMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API