Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Oriana House, Inc. v. Montgomery

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2006No. 2005-1505Published

1Dissent

Moyer, C J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 37} I respectfully dissent. This case, and many that have come before it, is an example of the difficult position in which courts are placed when legislatures adopt statutes that include words that are critical to the application of the statute, but then fail to define those words.

{¶ 38} Whether a record is a public record depends upon whether the record is kept by a public office. R.C. 149.43(A)(1). “Public office” is defined to include a number of designated legal entities. R.C. 149.011(A). Included among them are “institution[s]” and “public institution[s].” Id.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Memphis Publishing Co. v. Cherokee Children & Family Services, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Strothers v. WertheimOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Marks v. McKenzie High School Fact-Finding TeamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  5. Mossman v. DonaheyOhio Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API